Hinduism, Buddhism, Paganism and Organized Religion in the East

China and India are pagan, a word which I deprecatetheoretically absurd and is practically the religion of
if it is understood to imply inferiority but which ifmany Europeans. In some ways it is more intelligible
used in a descriptive and respectful sense is veryand reasonable than monotheism. For if there is only
useful. Christianity and Islam are organized religions.one personal God, I do not understand how anything
They say (or rather their several sects say) thatthat can be called a person can be so expanded as
they each not only possess the truth but that allto be capable of hearing and answering the prayers
other creeds and rites are wrong. But paganism is notof the whole world. Anything susceptible of such
organized: it rarely presents anything like a churchextension must be more than a person. Is it not at
united under one head: still more rarely does itleast equally reasonable to assume that there are
condemn or interfere with other religions unlessmany spirits, or many shapes taken by the
attacked first. Buddhism stands between the twosuperpersonal world spirit, with which the soul can
classes. Like Christianity and Islam it professes toget into touch?
teach the only true law, but unlike them it isThe worship of images cannot be recommended
exceedingly tolerant and many Buddhists also worshipwithout qualification, for it seems to require artists
Hindu or Chinese gods.capable of making a worthy representation of the
Popular religion in India and China is certainlydivine. And it must be confessed that many figures in
polytheistic, yet if one uses this word in contrast toIndian temples seem repulsive or grotesque, though a
the monotheism of Islam and of Protestantism theHindu might say that none of them are so strange in
antithesis is unjust, for the polytheist does notidea or so horrible in appearance as the crucifix.
believe in many creators and rulers of the world, inBut the claim of the iconoclast from the times of the
many Allahs or Jehovahs, but he considers that thereOld Testament onwards that he worships a spirit
are many spiritual beings, with different spheres andwhereas others worship wood and stone is true only
powers, to the most appropriate of whom heof the lowest phases of religion, if even there. Hindu
addresses his petitions. Polytheism and image-worshiptheologians distinguish different kinds of
lie under an unmerited stigma in Europe. We generallyavatâras or ways in which God descends into
assume that to believe in one God is obviouslythe world: among them are incarnations like Krishna,
better, intellectually and ethically, than to believe inthe presence of God in the human heart and his
many. Yet Trinitarian religions escape beingpresence in a symbol or image (arcâ).
polytheistic only by juggling with words, and if HindusIt may be difficult to decide how far the symbol and
and Chinese are polytheists so are the Roman andthe spirit are kept separate either in the East or in
Oriental Churches, for there is no real distinctionEurope, but no one can attend a great car-festival in
between praying to the Madonna, Saints and Angels,southern India or the feast of Durgâ in Bengal
and propitiating minor deities.without feeling and in some measure sharing the
William James has pointed out that polytheism is notecstasy and enthusiasm of the crowd.