Is Either Creation or Evolution the Right Answer?

The choice between creation and evolution as anthe defense began a series of questions designed to
explanation for human existence is a source ofundermine the literal interpretation of the Bible... asking
ongoing debate. The two camps of belief from bothquestions about Jonah being swallowed by a whale,
religion and science have been at odds on this topic inJoshua making the sun stand still, Noah and the great
American society for many years without muchflood, the temptation of Adam in the Garden of
compromise. People of both extremes have exertedEden, and the creation according to Genesis.
their will on the education and judicial justice systemsThe Scopes trial by no means ended the debate
in order to influence American society.over the teaching of evolution, but it did represent a
Creationists want literal bible scriptures related tosignificant setback for the anti-evolution forces. Of
creation taught to children in schools, whilethe fifteen states with anti- evolution legislation
Evolutionists want them to learn evolution. Whatpending in 1925, only two states (Arkansas and
should dominate American culture - religious belief inMississippi) enacted laws restricting teaching of
creation or scientific belief in evolution? The followingDarwin's theory.
historical event took place in pursuit of the answer toSome Creationist believe that famous scientists such
this very same question.as Einstein and Hawking believe: "God does not play
In the 1920s during social structure chaos,dice with the Universe." But to truly understand what
Traditionalists worried that their beliefs wereEinstein meant by that, you have to see into his
crumbling. Modernists stopped looking to society forviews toward god and religion because scientists
approval for their actions; they were only concernedoften use the word "god" to mean the laws of
that their actions lived up to their intellect.nature.
Intellectualism flourished during that time, whileThe Creationist-Evolutionist controversy represents
Americans danced to Jazz, drank alcoholic beveragestwo ways of relating to the world. One being belief
during prohibition, and debated abstract Freudianbased on unreasoned conviction and the other based
theories. As a result of this traditional social revivalismon reasoned. In other words belief in the literal
became strong, especially in the South.interpretation of the bible as opposed the scientific
Journalists were looking for a showdown during thatrationalistic approach, stemming from men like Thales,
time and found one in a Dayton, TennesseeAristotle, and reinterpreted through Galileo, Newton,
courtroom in the summer of 1925. A jury wasand others.
deciding the fate of John Scopes, a high schoolThe Enquiring Mind:
biology teacher charged with illegally teaching theIf you want to find a solution to this dilemma you'll
theory of evolution. Secondary to the actualfind clues on both sides of the debate. For example
anti-evolution statute the trial emerged as anscientists believe that the universe began with a Big
interpretation conflict between social and intellectualBang. From their prospective it's reasonable to believe
values.that something cannot be created from nothing? And
William Jennings Bryan, a previous Democratictherefore, if that's true then that something is what
candidate for President led the prosecution as acreated the universe. Call it God, cosmic law or
Fundamentalist to banish Darwin's theory of evolutionwhatever else, it's beyond comprehension at this
from American classrooms. Other prominent lawyerstime in human development.
were A. T. Stewart, Ben B. McKenzie, and Bryan'sBeing that humans are said to use only about 10% of
son, federal prosecutor William Jennings Bryan Jr.. Thethere brain power... and use language limiting the
defense team was lead by the famed Clarenceability to understand and convey universal law, there
Darrow and was joined by Arthur Garfield Hays, ais no wander that the human species has a limited
prominent free speech advocate, and Dudley Fieldunderstanding of its true origin. To expect human
Malone, an international divorce attorney.kind to know and understand the source of its
A carnival atmosphere pervaded in Dayton as theexistence is like asking a toddler to explain quantum
trial began July 10, 1925. The prosecution opened itsphysics.
case by asking the court to take judicial notice of theWhere do these two beliefs find their basis of
Book of Genesis, as it appears in the King Jamesconflict? Creationist find their information in the Bible,
Version, and received it. The defense called its firstwhile Evolutionist find their's in the science of Biology.
witness, Dr. Maynard Metcalf, a zoologist from theIs there a conflict between Science and Religion? If
Johns Hopkins University, over objections from theyou take the Fundamentalist approach (everything in
prosecution.the Bible is to be taken literally), then there is conflict.
The prosecution mocked Metcalf's exposition of theIf, on the other hand, the Bible is not taken literally,
theory of evolution, complaining that the evolutioniststhen there is room to grow in harmony with universal
had man descending from Old World monkeys. Thenknowledge with no conflict.