Big Bully?

Bully politics drives discontent, ignores the needs ofthe selection of candidates themselves? Is this not a
the people, using fear in place of responsibility.case of dominance and bullying?"
What does bullying have to do with politics? Far tooAs a result, PRS was caught in a dilemma. PRS could
much, sadly. Bully politics adopts ahave rejected the suggested replacements or it could
"for-me-or-against-me" posture, led by one whohave accepted them. A refusal to accept the
prefers to crush their enemies rather than allow themreplacement candidates could have left the party
a voice. It's an abuse of a position to secure andopen to accusations of being disloyal to BN, a grave
maintain power. It's a contrived, manipulative politicalenough political sin. Such a move would have put PRS
agenda, where voters become spectators and thoseleadership in hot soup and perhaps alienate the party
who try to speak up and become engaged arefrom BN.
quickly quieted by political handlers.The impact on PRS was that it was a tremendous
A well-used tool of political bullying is the fanatical'let down'. The perception was that a partner in
control of all communications, a management styleSarawak BN - the PBB - was being 'too dominant'.
embraced by our ruling power. The UMNO-ownedThe BN top leadership should realize that the coalition
Malay daily Utusan Malaysia has come under firemust wake up to current political realities and stop
numerous times for carrying articles with a racial slant.being in a state of denial. The National Front suffered
Ethnic Malays comprise about 60 percent ofa stinging blow in March general elections when a
Malaysia's 27 million people. Minorities include largemultiracial opposition alliance made unprecedented
ethnic Chinese and Indian communities, who aregains, winning 82 seats in the 222-member Parliament
mainly Buddhists, Christians and Hindus. In Malaysia,by promising to treat all ethnic communities equally.
UMNO has over-dominated the ruling Barisan NasionalBefore, there was only BN which could provide the
coalition at the expense of other component parties.national leadership. After March 2008, PRS has realize
In September 2009 Penang UMNO division chiefthat they have perhaps other better options. We
Datuk Ahmad Ismail exhibited supreme arroganceshall see the test of time.
when he showed no remorse for calling MalaysianPenang Chief Minister, Lim Guan Eng recently in March
Chinese" immigrants " ("pendatangs) at a rally in the2010 blasted Second Finance Minister Datuk Seri
run-up to the Permatang Pauh by-election. And whenAhmad Husni Hanadzlah for his racial slur during the
Gerakan stood up to him, he behaved just like aPenang Malay Chamber of Commerce dinner. Ahmad
schoolyard bully. He asked for Gerakan to be kickedHusni was reported saying that if the Chinese in
out of the BN.Penang bully the Malays, the Malays would bully the
The then chairman of BN and president of UMNO,Chinese. Lim Guan Eng cited Ahmad Husni's statement
Abdullah Ahmad Badawi and the party's supremeas being appalling, inciting racial sentiments and
council members only took disciplinary action againstseditious.
the Bukit Bendera politician after being pushed into a"It is not the Chinese bullying the Malays or vice
corner. Even then, it was half-hearted attempt toversa, neither is there any form of bullying in Penang,
apply balm on the raw feelings of the non-Malays.but it has been the Barisan Nasional and UMNO which
Ethnic Malays comprise about 60 percent ofhas been bullying Penangnites over the past 52
Malaysia's 27 million people. Minorities include largeyears," he added.
ethnic Chinese and Indian communities, who areLim said being the second finance minister, Ahmad
mainly Buddhists, Christians and Hindus.Husni should have based his allegations on facts and
A poll by the Merdeka Centre in July 2009 showedfigures instead of trying to incite hatred and making
that 66% of Chinese and 60.1% of Indians agreeemotional and baseless statements.
that the BN does not represent the voice of allLim quoted figures from the Public Works
communities.Department-funded projects in Penang which showed
A Parti Rakyat Sarawak (PRS) division leader hasthe number of contracts awarded to bumiputra
described Umno at the federal level and Parti Pesakacontractors in the state.
Bumiputra Bersatu (PBB) in Sarawak as 'too dominant'In 2009, all 125 projects worth RM4.4 million (under
and indeed are 'bullies' in their dealings with smallerRM200,000) and tender above RM200,000, 24
component parties in the Barisan Nasional. Inprojects worth RM4.01 million were all given to
Sarawak, PRS, a component party inside the statebumiputras while in 2008, 158 projects worth RM9.25
and federal Barisan Nasional has been bullied by whatmillion (under RM200,000) and nine projects above
could collectively be called the 'BN leadership'. The BNRM200,000 worth RM5.52 million were all awarded to
system has generated a state-level entity wherebumiputra contractors.
there has been one dominant party - the PBB whichOur former Prime Minister, Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad
is leading the state BN government.took a leap forward recently to undermine further his
There were two instances of UMNO and PBB bullyinglegacy by launching the PERKASA's inaugural
PRS.congress. PERKASA is the radical side of UMNO. Dr
The first was during the 2006 state election when aMahathir told the congress that PERKASA's existence
component BN party was 'allowed' to steal a PRSwas due to a weak UMNO and that the government
seat. Neither the state nor federal BN intervenedshould listen to the Malays, not just the non-Malays.
effectively to stop a component party fromNow, we know that Vision 2020 is piece of useless
interfering in the affairs of another. Where was BNpolicy paper and a public relations spin. PERKASA is
when effective action was needed? It was as if theundermining Najb's 1Malaysia initiative. Other race
BN was shutting its proverbial 'eye' to the intra-BNbased parties in Barisan such as MIC and MCA are
infighting in Sarawak. By letting the problem fester, itsuffering a loss of popularity and political relevance
was acting as a bully, not a problem solver.because they never insisted that UMNO listen also to
The second incident was during the March generalthe non-Malays who are legitimate Malaysians.
election when two of the party's candidates wereTwo ethnic Chinese Barisan Nasional (BN) leaders
rejected without any reason. Why was PBB allowedhave openly snubbed Perkasa Youth's demand for an
to choose its candidates to contest on PRS seats?apology, continuing instead to criticise the Malay rights
"Where is the principle that component parties oughtgroup by saying that its struggles were not in line
to be free to conduct their own affairs and makewith the prime minister's 1 Malaysia concept.