Commentary on "Real Religion" by Swami Vivekananda

Swami Vivekananda presented the talk, Real ReligionGod-realization cannot be achieved by reading
at the World's Parliament of Religions in 1893. Withdoctrines or encyclicals. The Christian Testament
this speech, he introduced Vedanta (AKA Hinduism)points to a reality that must be experienced. The
to the West. It is more than 100 years later and thepurpose of the Gospels, for example, is to encourage
Christian West continues to struggle with the world'sfaithful to embark on a journey home to God and to
religions. This is a brief opportunity to comment onportray the unfathomable source of pure love that is
Vivekananda's speech.God. But, the words are not the journey. "The raft is
"Religion does not consist in doctrines or dogmas."not the shore." If you meet the Buddha on the road,
What simple and wise words. However, the religionkill him.
of the West, Christianity, is devoted to its doctrinesThis does not mean that doctrines, dogma, sacred
and dogmas. Doctrines about Christianity as thetexts are disposable and without real spiritual value. I
exclusive path to salvation are the roots of Christianmerely suggest that the source of strife among the
evangelization and, sadly, of Christian intolerance. Suchpeoples of the world is inordinate reliance upon
intolerance extends to the ends of the earth. Thereligious teachings at the expense of emphasis upon
Catholic hierarchy, for example, sets its gaze uponan experience of God and the consequent
every religious tradition and judges. The proselytizingcomprehension of the interrelationship among all
view of the Catholic Church and all of Christianity,people and the cosmos.
peruses its own house. In Catholicism, for example,For religious leaders in any religious traditions, why is it
Catholic theologians who dare to present theologicalso incomprehensible to agree with Vivekananda: "As
arguments for salvation in religions other thansoon as a man stands up and says he is right or his
Christianity are silenced, taken from teachingchurch is right and all others are wrong, he himself all
positions, indexed.wrong." Of course, in order to be consistent, I
I agree with Vivekananda. Doctrine is not the samesuppose I must admit that I could be wrong.
as the experience to which doctrine points.