kashmir

Kashmirwhich is 60% Buddhist (Bose S, 2005). These linguistic
The valley of Kashmir, famed for its beauty andand religious divisions have played a major role in the
tranquility, becomes a major flashpoint, threateningconflict with the pattern of being an important
the stability of a region of great strategic importanceindicator The violence and the causalities are the
to pose a nuclear threat for the entire worldmaximum in the districts of the Kashmir Valley and
(Schofield V). This paper examines the Kashmirsome borders areas of Jammu whereas most of the
conflict, the peoples fight for self-determination andplain areas and Hindu majority areas of Jammu are
ways to solve the protracted conflict.  Pakistan hasunaffected by the conflict (Fourth World Bulletin).
long claimed Kashmir on account of its largely MuslimMany agree that the will of Kashmiri Muslims who
population, while India has affirmed its legalcomprise the vast majority about 90% of
possession of the territory since 1947. Kashmir isKashmir’s population has been denied rights by
thus a bone of contention between India andthe Hindu state of India (World Fourth Bulletin).
Pakistan. The genesis of this crisis lies in the fact thatOthers view that indigenous peoples have been
when in 1947 British India was divided, Muslimcaught in the cross-fire between India and Pakistan
majority areas went to Pakistan, and Hindu majorityand between Hindus and Muslims. The Hindu Pandits
areas to India. The state of Jammu and Kashmir wasand the Ladakhis who are Tibetan Mahayana Buddhist
one of 584 princely states of British India, with apeople are trying to retain their ancient culture and
Muslim majority, ruled by a Hindu Maharaja.also regain some control of the remote, rugged
Demographyplateau they call as ‘home’. The Panun
Kashmir holds a strategic position in Asia as it is(“our own”) Kashmir is an organization began
surrounded by key countries like Pakistan,in 1991 with 1,200 Pandits in Jammu (Fourth World
Afghanistan and China. It is 86,000 sq miles (GangulyBulletin). They are demanding Union territory status
S, 1997). 'Kashmiri' is a wide term applied for severaland they blame Pakistan for waging a proxy war by
streams of immigrants mainly from Turkey, Iran,supplying the Islamic terrorists with weapons and
Central Asia and Afghanistan, and settled in thepersuading the Kashmiri Muslims to join in the violence.
valley. The various ethnic groups of the Jammu andOn January 19, 1990, the central government
Kashmir state are Dards who occupy the valley ofimposed direct rule on the state. From the outset,
Gurez, Hanjis confined to water bodies of Kashmir;the Indian government's campaign against the
Gujjars and Bakarwals living and oscillating in the Kandimilitants was marked by widespread human rights
areas; Dogras occupying the outskirts of the Punjabviolations, including the shooting of unarmed
plain, while Chibhalis and Paharis are living betweendemonstrators, civilian massacres, and summary
Chenab and Jhelum rivers. Moreover, there areexecutions of detainees. On the other side, the
numerous small ethnic groups like Rhotas, Gaddis andmilitant groups stepped up their attacks, murdering
Sikhs which have significant concentration in isolatedand threatening Hindu residents, carrying out
pockets of the State (Ganguly S, 1997)kidnappings and assassinations of government
Historical backgroundofficials, civil servants, and suspected informers, and
Sumantra Bose (2005) has given a historical analysis inengaging in sabotage and bombings. With the
his book ‘Kashmir’. India and Pakistan firstencouragement and assistance of the government,
went to war in October 1947 after Pakistansome 100,000 Hindu Kashmiris, known as "Pandits,"
supported a Muslim insurgency in Kashmir (Bose S,fled the valley (Fourth World Bulletin). The Kashmir
2005). India agreed to a request for armedviolence claims almost 30,000-40,000 casualties
assistance from Kashmir's Maharaja, in return forannually (Fourth World Bulletin).
accession of the state to India. But the nature ofOn May 2002, both India and Pakistan tests a series
that accession has long been the subject of debate.of nuclear capable ballistic missile and signals that
The war ended on Jan. 1, 1949, with thethreatens the peace of the Asian subcontinent.
establishment of a ceasefire line sponsored by theTheories associated
United Nations. The then Indian Governor GeneralThe Kashmir conflict from a theoretical perspective is
Lord Mountbatten wrote that “the question ofbased on primordialism as a distinct ethnic and
the State's accession shall be settled by a referencereligious community, the muslims fight for
to the people"(Bose S. 2005). The two resolutionsself-determination with the aid of Al-Qaeda, Taliban
passed on August 13, 1948, and January 5, 1949and Lashkar e Taiyaba. But this ‘protracted social
regard that the future status of Jammu and Kashmirconflict’ has been classified as instrumentalism.
shall be determined in accordance with the will of theAccording to Anthony Smith (2001), ethnic leaders
people and the question of the accession of theuse their cultural groups as sites of mass-mobilization
State of Jammu and Kashmir to India or Pakistan willand as constituencies in their competition for power
be decided through the democratic method of a freeand resources. According to Madhumita Srivastava
and impartial plebiscite (Schofield V).The UN Security(2001), the Kashmir conflict involves historical, political,
Council Resolution 122 of January 24, 1957, provideseconomic, cultural and security aspects. She regards
that, "the final disposition of the state of Jammu andthat, the “Kashmir conflict is primarily and
Kashmir will be made in accordance with the will offundamentally an ethnic conflict……and its
the people expressed through the democraticresolution may be found in upholding, rejuvenating
method of a free and impartial plebiscite conductedand establishing the Kashmiriyat in an acceptable
under the auspices of the United Nations" ( Bose S,framework in the larger freedom and political
2005). The modalities of such a plebiscite have beenorder”.
spelled out in the Security Council Resolution 47 ofRecent developments
April 21, 1948 (Bose S, 2005). India initially agreed toThose fighting for Kashmiri independence called the
hold the plebiscite. Indian then Prime Minister Ptelections a sham. The All-Party Hurriyat Conference
Jawaharlal Nehru pledged to the people of Kashmir an(APHC), an association of 30 pro-independence and
affirmation of the Kashmiri peoples right topro-Pakistan parties comprising Mujaheedeen, Al
self-determination. India later reneged on itsQaeda and other oraganizations boycotted the
commitment. Since then, it has contemptuouslyelections to protest the lack of international oversight
disregarded the various UNCIP and Security Councilof the polling, and the absence of a referendum on
resolutions calling for the plebiscite and today we findself-determination. The group launched an anti-election
that the disposition of Kashmir has not been legallycampaign in which they urged Kashmiris to stay away
decided. The Constitution of India was adopted onfrom the polls.
January 26, 1950 and there was no provision keptRole of United States and United Nations
for self-determination in the Constitution. Therefore,The United Nations Security Council first
the Government of India too had no right to talkacknowledged the Jammu and Kashmir issue in 1948
about this plan. When the Constitution of India hasand has continued to be an active participant in the
not given the right to Government of India to reviewresolution of the conflict. The United States
the questions of self-determination and accession, itincreasingly focused its attention on this region of the
is unconstitutional and illegal for any internationalworld after 1998 when nuclear testing by both
organization to talk anything in the context of India.nations suddenly transformed the threat that the
The entire dispute should have ended with theconflict posed into a very real, potentially catastrophic
ratification of the accession by the Constituentone. In 2002, nuclear-armed adversaries India and
Assembly on November 17, 1956 (Bose S, 2005).Pakistan mobilized for war over the long-disputed
Both Pakistan and the Security Council have lost anyterritory of Kashmir, sparking panic around the world.
right to talk anything about Kashmir or do anythingThe conflict became a grave threat to South Asia
about it. This Assembly adopted the Constitution of.The United States government is now pursuing a
the State. The clause three of this Constitutionmuch more active policy in the region, serving as a
makes it clear "Jammu and Kashmir is and will remainmediator in the conflict.
inseparable part of India."(Bose S, 2005). On AugustSolution
15, 1947 the Pakistan held Kashmir was also underAccording to me, there are various measures which
the control of the ruler of the State. Therefore, it isneed to be taken to ensure free and impartial
evident that the entire Jammu and Kashmir State isplebiscite:i) Complete cease-fire: The two countries
an inseparable part of India. The Maharaja hadshould announce the complete cease-fire along the
acceded this undivided state to India. As suchLine of Control (LOC) to ensure that there is no
occupation of even an inch of the territory ofuntoward incident. The government of Pakistan
Kashmir by Pakistan will be treated as aggression onshould take militants into confidence. Mirwaiz Umer
India. This clause of the Constitution is furtherFarooq once said in aninterview that Hurriyat can
strengthened and shielded by clause 147. Accordingconvince militants on cease-fire and if Hurriyat can do
to this clause, clause four cannot be nullified. And thethat then I believe Pakistan government should not
Security Council too loses its right to give guidancefind it an impossible task.ii) Demilitarization: After the
and direction to India on matters connected withcease-fire is ensured, India should call back its troops
Kashmir (Bose S, 2005).from Indian Administered Kashmir (IAK) and,
In 1948, India under the guidance of Pt Nehru, thesimultaneously, Pakistan, too, should follow the suit
then Prime –Minister of India unilaterally orderedby calling back its troops from Pakistan Administered
cease-fire. It could have regained its two-third areaKashmir (PAK).iii) Post Demilitarization: After the
of Kashmir. Later in 1965, the Pakistani offensive plandemilitarization, the UN security forces should occupy
i.e. a thrust against Indian line of communication atboth sides of the divided Kashmir. The UN can ask
Akhnur between Indian Corps holding Ravi-Sutlejfor reinforcement from any member country (of
Corridor at Jandiala Guru on Amritsar-Jullundhur roadcourse, except from India and Pakistan) to maintain
was a good maneuver to gain access over a largelaw and order in the erstwhile Jammu & Kashmir
part of Kashmir ( Bose S, 2005). Such an aggressiveand pave the way for an impartial and peaceful
step initiated by Pakistan would compel the Indians toplebiscite. The observers of the United Nation should
sue for peace at best or they would surrender atremain in Kashmir and should keep a close vigil on the
worst as confessed by the Indian Westernscheme of things, and when the situation becomes
Command Capt. Harbaksh Singh (Bose S, 2005). Butconducive, the observers should go for referendum.
the Pakistani army failed due to operational failure inSince, people of Kashmir do not want the solution of
Chamb-Jaurian and organizational failure in KhemKashmir on ethnic or religious basis, therefore, the
Karan. Thus the second Indo-Pak war ends afterPandits who left Kashmir in one of the most
United Nation call for a ceasefire. The Sovietunfortunate incident in the history of Kashmir should
mediated Tashkent Declaration officially ends the warbe called back as an integral part of Kashmir's culture
in January 1966.and identity, they too would decide the future of
In 1971, the Indians won great glory as they overranKashmir along with their Muslim brethren.  As
East Pakistan creating a new state of Bangladesh.mentioned in the United Nations Resolution 1514 (XV)
This reduced Pakistan’s defense problems andof December 14, 1960, on the "Declaration on the
increased their own problems by creating a newgranting of independence to colonial countries and
state. The Pakistanis conceived a fine plan to capturepeoples," that all peoples have the right to
Poonch and Barapind but the Indian brigadeself-determination, by virtue of that right they freely
commander at both the places was too resolutedetermine their political status and freely pursue their
(Bose S, 2005). Pakistan had lost its face in both theeconomic, social and cultural development.
wars but on both the occasions India bartered awayThe referendum, as already stated, should be held in
its battle gains on the diplomatic level. When the Simlatwo phases:
talks were going on, after the 1971 war, there wereFirst Phase: - In the first phase people of Kashmir
93,000 Pakistani war prisoners with India and 5,000would vote between independence or Union. The
sq. kms of Pakistani territory with India (Schofield V).referendum would be held under the aegis of the
But India allowed Pakistan to capture one-third areaUnited Nations and onerepresentative each from India
of Kashmir and returned 93,000 war prisoners.and Pakistan would monitor the democratic exercise.
Through the Simla Agreement, Pakistan was alsoIf the people of Kashmir vote for the Union, then
accepted as a party to the Kashmir issue.  Prior tosecond phase of voting becomes inevitable.
this agreement, there was a cease-fire line betweenSecond Phase: - In the second phase of voting,
Kashmir and the occupied Kashmir but under thepeople of Kashmir would choose between Union with
Simla Agreement this cease-fire line was convertedIndia and Union with Pakistan. Their 'will' must only
to the Line of Actual Control. By this Agreement thedecide with which country they want to associate
Kashmir problem came out of the arena of thetheir future.
United Nations and became a bilateral matterHowever, both the countries should respect the
between India and Pakistan. It was agreed upon inconsequences of the electoral verdict without being
the Agreement that the two countries will maintainegoistical. If Kashmir decides to accede to Pakistan
peaceful co-existence on the basis of equality andthen Jammu and Ladakh will, by default, go to India
mutual interest, respect, for mutual regional solidarityand in case the Kashmiris favour India, even in that
and sovereignty and desist from interfering in thecase Jammu and Ladakh will remain a part of India
internal matters of each other. The two countries willbecause there is apparently no dispute over Jammu
remain committed to maintain cordial neighborlyor Ladakh between India and Pakistan. Therefore,
relations by resolving bilateral disputes throughthere is no denying the fact that unlike the common
negotiations in order to establish durable peace.belief, Kashmir can survive as an independent entity.
                       Again the 1999If the people of Kashmir decide to be Independent,
crisis in Kargil were the result of an audaciousboth India and Pakistan have to guarantee its
Pakistani plan to inflict a sharp but highly subtleIndependence. For a start, Kashmir would not have
psychological defeat on the Indians by threateningits own currency but the currency of both India and
the Indian line of communication to Leh and SiachenPakistan would be accepted as legal tender money.
by placing a small Pakistani force on the heightsKashmir, as an independent state, would have a free
overlooking the Dras-Kargil-Leh Road (Bose S, 2005).trade with both India and Pakistan and both the
The 1999, Indo – Pakistan conflict over Kargil andcountries would invest in its economy. It is an
consequent intermittent skirmishes have resulted inadmitted fact that only fruit and tourism industry, if
displacement of 60,000 to 100,000 people (Schofieldproperly managed, are enough to keep the economy
V). The largest towns in the area, Kargil and Drasof Kashmir afloat.
were completely deserted. The Line of ControlThis paper explains the intricate mix of regional,
separates India administered Kashmir from theethnic, linguistic, religious, and caste communities that
Pakistan-administered counterpart from Dras in Northpopulate Kashmir, and emphasizes that a viable
Kashmir to Rajouri in the Jammu division. As a resultframework for peace must be adopted. The
it has remained a bone of contention between theestablishment of representative political structures in
two regional nuclear powers. Continuous exchange ofIndian Kashmir, and cross-border links between Indian
artillery and light weapons across the Line of Controland Pakistani Kashmir will improve the economy of
(LOC ) and on 87 infiltration routes have claimed 1,151Kashmir. I believe that "Kashmir" is a vital reading for
deaths including those of security personnel (anyone wishing to understand one of the world's
Schofield V). Thus Indo-Pak Military history is amost dangerous conflicts.
continuous story of strategic failures and a mix ofReferences:
operational successes and failures.1. Bartell Jeremy The War in Kashmir, the Pandits and
Different groups and right to self determinationLadakhis
It is a reality that the right of self-determination inFourth World Bulletin, Vol. 6
Kashmir is being given a religious base. Kashmir is a2. Bose Sumantra (2005), Kashmir: Roots of Conflict,
multi-ethnic state. Kashmir comprises three mainPaths to Peace, Harvard University
regions Jammu, Kashmir and Ladakh. EthnicallyPress
geographically and with respect to religion, the three3. Ganguly Sumit (1997): The Crisis in Kashmir,
regions are very diverse. Kashmir – is 90%Cambridge University Press
Muslim, Jammu- which is 60% Hindu and Ladakh4.