Science, Religion and the Curriculum of the West

"body">Other emerging disciplines soon set about
Human reason so delights in constructions, that it hasconstructing alternative ways to dissect or cut up
several times built up a tower, and then razed it tothe world, identifying effects and linking them to
examine the nature of the foundation. It is never toocauses on a newly established unidirectional temporal
late to become wise; but if the change comes tooaxis - an historical timeline. Through the proper
late, there is always more difficulty in starting aapplication of the new logistic - linking universals to
reform. The question whether a science be possible,particulars in the form of laws - prediction and control
presupposes a doubt as to its actuality. But such awere achieved. Scientific laws of course would give
doubt offends the men whose whole possessionspredictive control over nature; religious laws, control
consist of this supposed jewel; hence he who raisesover human affairs. And history would become a
the doubt must expect opposition from all sides.story of the adventures of these diverse but
[Immanuel Kant, Prolegomena to any Futureinterlaced controlling hierarchies - religious, political, and
Metaphysics, Intro: 256]scientific.
We are told that history begins in Sumer, near theSeemingly locked in eternal strife, science (with its
Persian Gulf, where the first civil laws were instituted"discovered" laws) and religion (with its "revealed"
roughly fifty-five hundred years ago. Coincident withlaws) would be enemies in posture only - mutually
this founding, there emerged entirely new ways ofdependent sibling rivals, established at the dawn of
thinking, acting, and interacting with one's fellowcivilization, providing guidance and control in hierarchical
citizens. With those first social laws, citizenship wasinstitutions now dominating modern life. The
born. The overwhelming evidence from anthropology,conceptual foci of these two siblings - the empirical
archeology, paleontology, ethnography and theand the transcendental - were simply two sides of
history of religions strongly reinforces the view that athe same advancing historical consciousness, reflected
new set of problems arose with the transition fromas well in the pre-Socratic philosophical struggles over
an egalitarian kinship-based, predominantly nomadic"being" and "becoming." Quite simply, science and
hunting/gathering lifestyle characterizing the Paleolithic,religion staked out two complementary positions on
and autonomous villages representative of theone and the same "objective" reality appearing in the
Neolithic, to more sedentary, hierarchically structuredbreach from prehistory to history.
life ways, based primarily on intensive plant and animalIn addition to the problem of control, however, there
domestication economies, that erupted onto thealso arose the question of meaning, of history's
scene at the close of the Neolithic period.purpose. If we citizens were now locked in a
This transformation had an incalculable impact uponunidirectional historical trajectory, with a present
human consciousness over the ensuing centuries,moment that was simply waiting between an
producing entirely novel categories for understandinghistorical past bearing down on us and an anticipated
and manipulating the world. Reality was constitutedfuture pulling us forward, then what was the
differently after the birth of civilization than it hadpurpose, the goal, the endpoint of this forward
been previously. This would have resoundingmovement?
reverberations for all generations to follow,Scientific rationality certainly provided the scaffolding
entrenched as they were in new hierarchies andupon which to build civilization's "tower" but could give
institutions that would appear, including formalno clear guidance about the ultimate purpose of
institutions of education. Borrowing terminology, I willhistorical life, or insight into the meaningful "end" of
call this new model according to which reality washistory. Religion, on the other hand, offered a vision
thereafter constituted, the curriculum of the West.of the ultimate goal, the telos of history, but needed
The burgeoning temperament for this new way ofscience to supply it with a fallen world of mere
seeing the world affected every dimension of life asobjects, along with the unfolding historical drama
civilization spread, and cities continued to populate theagainst which the transcendental vision could play
globe over subsequent millennia.itself out. Together they succeeded in focusing
Along with the shift from communal sharing ofhuman intuition and praxis on what appeared to be
essential resources, to privatization of access tothe appropriate direction of historical consciousness -
those resources, a cardinal issue to surface from thisthe future, progress, and achieving the proper "ends"
change of perspective was the need for control:of life.
control of the natural world to ensure food supplies,It seems almost axiomatic today that progress has
and control of the citizenry to ensure the protectionbecome a good in itself - some might even argue the
and safety of those supplies.only legitimate means of achieving "the good life."
With respect to control of nature, scientific inquiryIndeed, scientific rationality and engineering prowess
eventually found its voice, leading to the articulationnow appear to constitute the new faith of a new
of laws by means of which nature could beera. The foundation stones of a nascent
manipulated. The first formal laws, following antechno-theocracy, they may be marching us,
explicitly scientific logistic, appeared in Greece onlyhyper-rationally, to a fabricated and perhaps
about twenty-five hundred years ago; but theirapocalyptic Eschaton. Their dominion is so totalizing
foundations were laid much earlier - their necessitythey have undermined the simple enjoyment of a
issuing from the demands of a sedentary lifestylemore spontaneous life, lived more simply on mother
and early proto-scientific pursuits to gain control overearth.
the agricultural cycle.In addition to a foundation razing critique of the
Second, with the fracturing of kinship in the newlycurriculum, we are in desperate need today of a
established social settings of cities, kingdoms, andvocabulary and a path that allows for a more
satellite villages, the need for control over personscircumspect view of the trajectory of historical
also became paramount. This was particularly true inconsciousness, and assists us in understanding how
larger urban centers, whose populations werescience and religion have been interlaced from their
comprised mainly of displaced villagers and othervery beginnings in creating and driving civilization's
relocated strangers. In this context, revealed religionagenda. By so doing, we may yet "recover the
often aligned with already entrenched politicalmemory of another, perhaps more compelling way to
hierarchies - temple and palace together - served tolive," informing a new mode of praxis. But, to Kant's
provide sacred law for the conduct of individualearlier point, is it perhaps too late for such reform,
behavior and control of social relations.and is the opposition simply too great?