The Inertia of Power

I hate it when Saddam Hussein gets proved to beand that, if the presidency had to resort to
right ...Buried in all his pre-invasion bluster was amisleading information in order to gain support for
promise that Iraqis would give the Americansdoing so, then they would provide it.The article,
'another Viet Nam' if they tried to occupy the'Intelligence, Policy and the War in Iraq' doesn't have
country. To many, this sounded like just anotherany new revelations. Its significance is the fact that
empty threat, but I took note when he said it.TheMr Pillar, a 28-year CIA operative, was directly
reason for my attention had nothing to do withinvolved in the picking and choosing of data ordered
Saddam or any tribal fealties in his favor. Instead, itby the presidency to make its case, rather than
gave me pause to recall a comment made to me bybeing allowed to take the more ethical and
a veteran foot soldier who fought in World War II.responsible path of reviewing all data and arriving at
We had a conversation in Geneva in the early 1980s,objective conclusions. (Lest someone attmepts to
just before the Cold War began to thaw. I remarkedaccuse Mr Pillar of being a bureaucratic malcontent,
about the superior weapons technology that Ihe was installed on the faculty for Security Studies at
thought gave America a distinct advantage over thethe prestigious Georgetown University soon after his
Soviets, and the vet responded by dismissing hi-techresignation from the CIA.)The astounding carnage of
armories."War is about killing your enemy one at aViet Nam --- 58,000 American dead, over 150,000
time and gaining territory a step at a time," he said.wounded; approximately 2-4million Vietnamese dead
"And you can only do that with the grunts on theand wounded --- still dwarfs the totals for the Iraqi
ground."In what's become a prolonged battleincursion, but tell that to each family who loses a
between the forces of technology and terrorism inloved one and see if it offers them any solace.
Iraq, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld is theThese soldiers, fighters and innocents are not dying
latest to challenge the old vet's advice. It's alsoor being maimed for noble causes, but for cynical
looking like he'll be the latest to rue thatagenda: vague definitions of an enemy on one side
decision.However, such repentance will probably notand warped extreme fundamentalism on the other.
occur in the short term. Just as the Gulf of TonkinThe fact that the casualties in Iraq show no signs of
fabrication --- where the Johnson presidency alleged asubsiding make the assertions in Mr Pillar's article all
since-debunked North Vietnamese torpedo boatthe more exasperating.A new documentary has also
attack on an American destroyer --- and thebeen recently released. 'Why We Fight' was produced
Watergate burglary were subordinated to the publicand directed by Eugene Jarecki, who used a
as mere historical footnotes by the administrations inspectrum of interviews to delve into the effects of
power at those times, the present Americancurrent American foreign policy. These range from
presidency appears to believe its power of office canformer Bush adminstration officials to critics to
trample any truth that may give the lie to its IraqiAmerican fighter pilots to a policeman who lost a son
folly.The trappings of the American presidency arewhen the jets hit the towers in New York.Jarecki's
such that the presidency's ability to do this is anpremise is based on a famous 'farewell' speech by
established fact. Richard Nixon suppressed the truthDwight David Eisenhower in 1961, who warned of a
long enough to win re-election. Lyndon Johnsonshadowy 'military-industrial complex' that had the
ultimately saw a nation so divided by the Viet Nampotential to hijack American foreign policy without
issue that he chose not to seek a second term, butthe public's ability to sufficiently contain it. Given
not before plunging the USA into a full-scale war.Eisenhower's status as the Allied supreme
Now, it's George W Bush who has slithered intocommander in World War II as well as his presidency,
another four year term, based in part on hishis warning was not only jarring, but prophetic,
administration's spin machine successfully keeping theespecially coming as it did on the throes of the Viet
roots of his Iraqi misadventure obscure to theNam conflict. All appearances now are that it's even
public.The harsh reality is that the omnipotence ofmore pertinent today.In retrospect, it is also ironic to
the world's most powerful government makes thethink that it may have been the Americans who
task of calling it into immediate account virtuallywere being held in check by the balance of power
impossible. Before any resistance can be effectivelyposed by a totalitarian Soviet regime. There's no
raised, considerable damage --- in lives and resourcesdoubt the reverse was true, as well, but I had
--- has already been irretrievably done.We alreadyalways thought the Americans realized their best
know that in Iraq, there were no weapons of massglobal weapon was their culture; I continue to believe
destruction. This has been countered by thetheir culture, not their weaponry, caused the USSR
presidential argument that, well, Saddam was a badto collapse. As such, I fail to understand why each
man. We also know now that there was nosuccessive American presidency hasn't realized that
relationship between al-Qaeda and Saddam. Yes, saidsimple and obvious observation.Putting that point to
the presidency, but there could have been in thean unscientific test, I've asked various citizens of Iraq
near future; this soon became a self-fulfilling--- and Iran, for that matter --- what foreign country
prophecy. Furthermore, even though the presidencythey most admire, and more often than not, they
claimed that American forces would be welcomed ascite the USA. If I follow that with a question about
liberators in Iraq, the locals there have so far shownwhich government they least admire, they cite the
a strange way of expressing their gratitude.How canUSA. Call me simplistic, but not only does it seem
these retorts go so consistently uncontested, withburgers and bluejeans do a better job of making
the possible exception of The Daily Show, which isfriends, they cause significantly fewer deaths in the
merely a cable comedy channel's satire of theprocess.However, as long as the American public
news?Now comes further evidence which damns theallows its presidency the inherent power of
dubious premises of presidential Iraqi policy, which hasoverbearing rebuttal to any dissenting information
recently appeared in the journal, Foreign Affairs. Thewithout a constant call to justify itself, there will be
author, Paul Pillar, is the recently resigned CIA headno subsidence in damaged lives or diverted
of intelligence for the Near East and South Asia, whoresources.Until then, as Saddam, the old vet and
held that office from 2000-2005. His job includedhistory have combined to predict, Iraq is a grunt's
managing the Bush administration's secretwar, fought one building at a time. And, like every
assessments regarding Iraq. In the article, heother war, not every grunt will come home alive or
contends that invading Iraq was a pre-ordained goalwell.