Intuition

I. The Three Intuitionsthe philosophical school of Phenomenology.
IA. Eidetic IntuitionsThe a-priori nature of intuitions of the first and the
Intuition is supposed to be a form of direct access.third kind led thinkers, such as Adolf Lasson, to
Yet, direct access to what? Does it access directlyassociate it with Mysticism. He called it an "intellectual
"intuitions" (abstract objects, akin to numbers orvision" which leads to the "essence of things". Earlier
properties - see "Bestowed Existence")? Arephilosophers and theologians labeled the methodical
intuitions the objects of the mental act of Intuition?application of intuitions - the "science of the
Perhaps intuition is the mind's way of interactingultimates". Of course, this misses the strong
directly with Platonic ideals or Phenomenologicalemotional content of mystical experiences.
"essences"? By "directly" I mean without theConfucius talked about fulfilling and seeking one's
intellectual mediation of a manipulated symbol system,"human nature" (or "ren") as "the Way". This nature is
and without the benefits of inference, observation,not the result of learning or deliberation. It is innate. It
experience, or reason.is intuitive and, in turn, produces additional, clear
Kant thought that both (Euclidean) space and timeintuitions ("yong") as to right and wrong, productive
are intuited. In other words, he thought that theand destructive, good and evil. The "operation of the
senses interact with our (transcendental) intuitions tonatural law" requires that there be no rigid codex, but
produce synthetic a-priori knowledge. The raw dataonly constant change guided by the central and
obtained by our senses -our sensa or sensoryharmonious intuition of life.
experience - presuppose intuition. One could argueII. Philosophers on Intuition - An Overview
that intuition is independent of our senses. Thus,IIA. Locke
these intuitions (call them "eidetic intuitions") wouldBut are intuitions really a-priori - or do they develop in
not be the result of sensory data, or of calculation,response to a relatively stable reality and in
or of the processing and manipulation of same. Kant'sinteraction with it? Would we have had intuitions in a
"Erscheiung" ("phenomenon", or "appearance" of anchaotic, capricious, and utterly unpredictable and
object to the senses) is actually a kind ofdisordered universe? Do intuitions emerge to
sense-intuition later processed by the categories ofcounter-balance surprises?
substance and cause. As opposed to theLocke thought that intuition is a learned and
phenomenon, the "nuomenon" (thing in itself) is notcumulative response to sensation. The assumption of
subject to these categories.innate ideas is unnecessary. The mind is like a blank
Descartes' "I (think therefore I) am" is an immediatesheet of paper, filled gradually by experience - by the
and indubitable innate intuition from which hissum total of observations of external objects and of
metaphysical system is derived. Descartes' work ininternal "reflections" (i.e., operations of the mind).
this respect is reminiscent of Gnosticism in which theIdeas (i.e., what the mind perceives in itself or in
intuition of the mystery of the self leads toimmediate objects) are triggered by the qualities of
revelation.objects.
Bergson described a kind of instinctual empathicBut, despite himself, Locke was also reduced to ideal
intuition which penetrates objects and persons,(innate) intuitions. According to Locke, a colour, for
identifies with them and, in this way, derivesinstance, can be either an idea in the mind (i.e., ideal
knowledge about the absolutes - "duration" (theintuition) - or the quality of an object that causes this
essence of all living things) and "élan vital" (theidea in the mind (i.e., that evokes the ideal intuition).
creative life force). He wrote: "(Intuition is an) instinctMoreover, his "primary qualities" (qualities shared by all
that has become disinterested, self-conscious,objects) come close to being eidetic intuitions.
capable of reflecting upon its object and of enlargingLocke himself admits that there is no resemblance or
it indefinitely." Thus, to him, science (the use ofcorrelation between the idea in the mind and the
symbols by our intelligence to describe reality) is the(secondary) qualities that provoked it. Berkeley
falsification of reality. Only art, based on intuition,demolished Locke's preposterous claim that there is
unhindered by mediating thought, not warped bysuch resemblance (or mapping) between PRIMARY
symbols - provides one with access to reality.qualities and the ideas that they provoke in the mind.
Spinoza's and Bergson's intuited knowledge of theIt would seem therefore that Locke's "ideas in the
world as an interconnected whole is also an "eideticmind" are in the mind irrespective and independent of
intuition".the qualities that produce them. In other words, they
Spinoza thought that intuitive knowledge is superiorare a-priori. Locke resorts to abstraction in order to
to both empirical (sense) knowledge and scientificrepudiate it.
(reasoning) knowledge. It unites the mind with theLocke himself talks about "intuitive knowledge". It is
Infinite Being and reveals to it an orderly, holistic,when the mind "perceives the agreement or
Universe.disagreement of two ideas immediately by
Friedrich Schleiermacher and Rudolf Otto discussedthemselves, without the intervention of any other...
the religious experience of the "numinous" (God, orthe knowledge of our own being we have by
the spiritual power) as a kind of intuitive, pre-lingual,intuition... the mind is presently filled with the clear light
and immediate feeling.of it. It is on this intuition that depends all the
Croce distinguished "concept" (representation orcertainty and evidence of all our knowledge...
classification) from "intuition" (expression of the(Knowledge is the) perception of the connection of
individuality of an objet d'art). Aesthetic interest isand agreement, or disagreement and repugnancy, of
intuitive. Art, according to Croce and Collingwood,any of our ideas."
should be mainly concerned with expression (i.e., withKnowledge is intuitive intellectual perception. Even
intuition) as an end unto itself, unconcerned withwhen demonstrated (and few things, mainly ideas,
other ends (e.g., expressing certain states of mind).can be intuited and demonstrated - relations within
Eidetic intuitions are also similar to "paramartha satya"the physical realm cannot be grasped intuitively), each
(the "ultimate truth") in the Madhyamika school ofstep in the demonstration is observed intuitionally.
Buddhist thought. The ultimate truth cannot beLocke's "sensitive knowledge" is also a form of
expressed verbally and is beyond empirical (andintuition (known as "intuitive cognition" in the Middle
illusory) phenomena. Eastern thought (e.g. ZenAges). It is the perceived certainty that there exist
Buddhism) uses intuition (or experience) to studyfinite objects outside us. The knowledge of one's
reality in a non-dualistic manner.existence is an intuition as well. But both these
IB. Emergent Intuitionsintuitions are judgmental and rely on probabilities.
A second type of intuition is the "emergent intuition".IIB. Hume
Subjectively, the intuiting person has the impressionHume denied the existence of innate ideas. According
of a "shortcut" or even a "short circuiting" of histo him, all ideas are based either on sense
usually linear thought processes often based on trialimpressions or on simpler ideas. But even Hume
and error. This type of intuition feels "magical", aaccepted that there are propositions known by the
quantum leap from premise to conclusion, thepure intellect (as opposed to propositions dependent
parsimonious selection of the useful and the workableon sensory input). These deal with the relations
from a myriad possibilities. Intuition, in other words, isbetween ideas and they are (logically) necessarily
rather like a dreamlike truncated thought process, thetrue. Even though reason is used in order to prove
subjective equivalent of a wormhole in Cosmology. Itthem - they are independently true all the same
is often preceded by periods of frustration, deadbecause they merely reveal the meaning or
ends, failures, and blind alleys in one's work.information implicit in the definitions of their own
Artists - especially performing artists (like musicians) -terms. These propositions teach us nothing about the
often describe their interpretation of an artwork (e.g.,nature of things because they are, at bottom, self
a musical piece) in terms of this type of intuition.referential (equivalent to Kant's "analytic
Many mathematicians and physicists (following a kindpropositions").
of Pythagorean tradition) use emergent intuitions inIIC. Kant
solving general nonlinear equations (by guessing theAccording to Kant, our senses acquaint us with the
approximants) or partial differential equations.particulars of things and thus provide us with
Henri Poincaret insisted (in a presentation to theintuitions. The faculty of understanding provided us
Psychological Society of Paris, 1901) that even simplewith useful taxonomies of particulars ("concepts").
mathematical operations require an "intuition ofYet, concepts without intuitions were as empty and
mathematical order" without which no creativity infutile as intuitions without concepts. Perceptions
mathematics is possible. He described how some of("phenomena") are the composite of the sensations
his creative work occurred to him out of the bluecaused by the perceived objects and the mind's
and without any preparation, the result of emergentreactions to such sensations ("form"). These
intuitions. These intuitions had "the characteristics ofreactions are the product of intuition.
brevity, suddenness and immediate certainty... MostIID. The Absolute Idealists
striking at first is this appearance of suddenSchelling suggested a featureless, undifferentiated,
illumination, a manifest sign of long, unconscious priorunion of opposites as the Absolute Ideal. Intellectual
work. The role of this unconscious work inintuition entails such a union of opposites (subject and
mathematical invention appears to me incontestable,object) and, thus, is immersed and assimilated by the
and traces of it would be found in other cases whereAbsolute and becomes as featureless and
it is less evident."undifferentiated as the Absolute is.
Subjectively, emergent intuitions are indistinguishableObjective Idealists claimed that we can know
from insights. Yet insight is more "cognitive" andultimate (spiritual) reality by intuition (or thought)
structured and concerned with objective learning andindependent of the senses (the mystical argument).
knowledge. It is a novel reaction or solution, based onThe mediation of words and symbol systems only
already acquired responses and skills, to new stimulidistorts the "signal" and inhibits the effective
and challenges. Still, a strong emotional (e.g., aesthetic)application of one's intuition to the attainment of real,
correlate usually exists in both insight and emergentimmutable, knowledge.
intuition.IIE. The Phenomenologists
Intuition and insight are strong elements in creativity,The Phenomenological point of view is that every
the human response to an ever changingthing has an invariable and irreducible "essence"
environment. They are shock inducers and("Eidos", as distinguished from contingent information
destabilizers. Their aim is to move the organism fromabout the thing). We can grasp this essence only
one established equilibrium to the next and thusintuitively ("Eidetic Reduction"). This process - of
better prepare it to cope with new possibilities,transcending the concrete and reaching for the
challenges, and experiences. Both insight and intuitionessential - is independent of facts, concrete objects,
are in the realm of the unconscious, the simple, andor mental constructs. But it is not free from
the mentally disordered. Hence the great importancemethodology ("free variation"), from factual
of obtaining insights and integrating them inknowledge, or from ideal intuitions. The
psychoanalysis - an equilibrium altering therapy.Phenomenologist is forced to make the knowledge
IC. Ideal Intuitionsof facts his point of departure. He then applies a
The third type of intuition is the "ideal intuition". Thesecertain methodology (he varies the nature and
are thoughts and feelings that precede anyspecifications of the studied object to reveal its
intellectual analysis and underlie it. Moral ideals andessence) which relies entirely on ideal intuitions (such
rules may be such intuitions (see "Morality - a Stateas the rules of logic).
of Mind?"). Mathematical and logical axioms and basicPhenomenology, in other words, is an Idealistic form
rules of inference ("necessary truths") may also turnof Rationalism. It applies reason to discover Platonic
out to be intuitions. These moral, mathematical, and(Idealism) essences. Like Rationalism, it is not empirical
logical self-evident conventions do not relate to the(it is not based on sense data). Actually, it is
world. They are elements of the languages we useanti-empirical - it "brackets" the concrete and the
to describe the world (or of the codes that regulatefactual in its attempt to delve beyond appearances
our conduct in it). It follows that these a-prioriand into essences. It calls for the application of
languages and codes are nothing but the set of ourintuition (Anschauung) to discover essential insights
embedded ideal intuitions.(Wesenseinsichten).
As the Rationalists realized, ideal intuitions (a class of"Phenomenon" in Phenomenology is that which is
undeniable, self-evident truths and principles) can beknown by consciousness and in it. Phenomenologists
accessed by our intellect. Rationalism is concernedregarded intuition as a "pure", direct, and primitive
with intuitions - though only with those intuitionsway of reducing clutter in reality. It is immediate and
available to reason and intellect. Sometimes, thethe basis of a higher level perception. A philosophical
boundary between intuition and deductive reasoningsystem built on intuition would, perforce, be non
is blurred as they both yield the same results.speculative. Hence, Phenomenology's emphasis on the
Moreover, intuitions can be combined to yieldstudy of consciousness (and intuition) rather than on
metaphysical or philosophical systems. Descartesthe study of (deceiving) reality. It is through
applied ideal intuitions (e.g., reason) to his eidetic"Wesensschau" (the intuition of essences) that one
intuitions to yield his metaphysics. Husserl,reaches the invariant nature of things (by applying
Twardowki, even Bolzano did the same in developingfree variation techniques).